Diagnostic Accuracy and Counseling Quality of GPT-4o for Strabismus and Pseudostrabismus in Patient-Generated Mobile Photographs: A Preliminary Evaluation

GPT-4o 对患者自拍手机照片中斜视和假性斜视的诊断准确性和咨询质量:初步评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research-grade artificial intelligence has been used to accurately diagnose strabismus from image input. OpenAI's consumer-oriented GPT-4o model can analyze images, but has shown poor accuracy for image-based diagnosis. Parents may turn to GPT-4o to support or refute visible health concerns for their children, such as strabismus. The study aims to evaluate GPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy and response quality for strabismus evaluation. METHODS: After gold-standard alternate cover exam by a clinician, 35 mobile photos of esotropia (13), pseudoesotropia (11), and exotropia (11) were selected. Images were excluded if a second "masked" examiner did not corroborate diagnosis. Images were submitted to a secure GPT-4o platform with patient-perspective prompts requesting overall evaluation (Prompt 1) and eye alignment evaluation (Prompt 2). Responses were graded by a pediatric ophthalmologist and certified orthoptist assessing for quality and safety. RESULTS: GPT-4o provided interpretations for 15/35 and 27/35 images after Prompts 1 and 2, respectively. Analysis of the accuracy includes a primary "intention-to-diagnose" and secondary "per-diagnosis" framework. The diagnostic accuracies in the primary and secondary analysis following prompt 1 were 14.3% (low sensitivity and specificity) and 33.3% (low sensitivity, high specificity), respectively. Following prompt 2, accuracies were 48.6% (moderate sensitivity, low specificity) and 63.0% (high sensitivity, low specificity). Overall, the mean rating for content for strabismus prompts was 4.94 ± 0.27 out of a best possible 6, and for pseudostrabismus, 5.14 ± 0.18 (p=0.638). CONCLUSION: GPT-4o shows poor accuracy for image-based strabismus diagnosis. GPT-4o frequently categorized pseudoesotropia as true strabismus and true strabismus as orthophoria. While the quality of responses was rated as good overall, the quality of counseling did not match what would be provided in a pediatric ophthalmology clinic. Patients, clinicians, and AI developers should be aware of the need for specialist evaluation for strabismus.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。