Assessment of Family Medicine Physicians' and Residents' Knowledge in Managing In-Flight Medical Emergencies: A Cross-Sectional Study From Qassim, Saudi Arabia

沙特阿拉伯卡西姆地区家庭医生和住院医师在处理机上医疗紧急情况方面的知识评估:一项横断面研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-flight medical emergencies (IMEs) pose unique challenges for healthcare professionals due to the limited resources and confined environment of aircraft. Despite the potential severity of such incidents, there is limited research on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of medical professionals regarding IMEs, particularly in specific regions such as Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving preparedness and ensuring better outcomes for passengers experiencing medical emergencies during flights. METHODOLOGY: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among family medicine residents and primary healthcare physicians in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. A total of 155 participants were recruited from the Family Medicine Academy and affiliated primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using an online, self-administered questionnaire covering demographic information, previous training attendance, beliefs about IMEs, knowledge of managing IMEs, and attitudes and practices toward IMEs. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York), employing descriptive statistics and chi-square tests for qualitative data. RESULTS: The study revealed that 51.0% of participants (n = 79) had inadequate knowledge, while 49.0% (n = 76) demonstrated adequate knowledge regarding IMEs. There were no significant differences in knowledge levels across demographic factors, including gender, nationality, current qualifications, country of medical education, marital status, and monthly income. However, income below 10,000 SAR (Saudi riyal) was associated with higher rates of inadequate knowledge. Despite a willingness to volunteer during IMEs, participants expressed concerns about legal issues and their confidence in managing such emergencies. Practical responses to hypothetical IME scenarios varied widely, with correct responses ranging from 19.4% to 80.6%. CONCLUSION: The findings underscore significant gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices among healthcare professionals in Qassim regarding IMEs. Despite a strong sense of duty to volunteer, participants expressed apprehensions about their competence and legal liabilities. Enhanced training programs and clearer guidelines are needed to improve preparedness and confidence among medical professionals, ultimately ensuring better outcomes for passengers experiencing in-flight medical emergencies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。