Comparison of health-related quality of life and cosmetic outcome between traditional gasless trans-axillary endoscopic thyroidectomy and modified gasless trans-axillary endoscopic thyroidectomy for patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

比较传统无气经腋窝内镜甲状腺切除术与改良无气经腋窝内镜甲状腺切除术治疗乳头状甲状腺微癌患者的健康相关生活质量和美容效果

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gasless trans-axillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) has been proved to provide better cosmetic results; however, it has limitations as dissection of central neck lymph nodes is difficult. We developed a modified approach (MGTET-modified GTET) and compared it with the traditional one in terms of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cosmetic results in order to provide more convincing therapeutic results. METHODS: Between January 2021 and June 2021, 100 cN0 patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma were randomized to undergo either MGTET (n = 50) or GTET (n = 50). These two groups' baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative findings, were compared. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was determined 6 months after surgery. Thyroid Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: M-GTET was associated with a larger number of lymph nodes dissected (p < 0.001), lower drainage volume (p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001), and shorter axillary incision (p < 0.001). POSAS was more favorable in M-GTET. HRQoL was significantly better for MGTET in terms of less problems with scar (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that MGTET provides better therapeutic, cosmetic, and HRQoL outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。