Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic cystectomy in bladder cancer

膀胱癌腹腔镜膀胱切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) surgical therapy in patients with bladder cancer (BC), and to provide evidence for the clinical treatment of BC. METHODS: The Embase, Ovid, PubMed, Medline, Springer, and Web of Sciences database were searched to screen articles with clinical controlled trials on LRC treatment of BC. The Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 software and Review Manager 5.3 software were adopted to evaluate the risk of bias and to perform a meta-analysis of the included articles in this study. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles were obtained, including 1,283 research cases. The meta-analysis results showed that relative to the control group (Ctrl), the observation group (Observ group) had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (IBL) after LRC [mean difference (MD) =-458.75; 95% confidential interval (CI): -505.75 to -411.76; Z=19.13; P<0.00001], blood transfusion rate (BTR) (odds ratio =0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.94; Z=2.08; and P=0.04), use of analgesics (MD =-24.53; 95% CI: -39.04 to -10.01; Z=3.31; and P=0.0009), and incidence of postoperative complications (Risk ratio =0.58; 95% CI: 0.39-0.85; Z=2.77; and P=0.006). However, and the length of hospital stay could not be shortened (MD =-2.43; 95% CI: -4.83 to -0.02; Z=1.98; and P=0.05). DISCUSSION: LRC treatment of BC could effectively reduce the amount of IBS, and lower the intraoperative BTR, use of analgesics, and incidence of postoperative complications. Therefore, it could be used in the clinical surgical treatment of BC patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。