Bowel complications and anastomotic leak after ileocolic anastomosis in urinary diversion surgery: a comparative 12-year retrospective single-center study

尿路改道手术中回结肠吻合术后肠道并发症和吻合口漏:一项为期12年的单中心回顾性比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited data within the urologic literature regarding bowel complications and leak rates following surgery requiring ileocolic anastomoses such as right colon pouch (RCP) and continent cutaneous ileocecocystoplasty (CCIC). We aimed to establish ileocolic anastomotic leak rates in urologic reconstructive surgery and determine bowel-related complications following RCP and CCIC surgeries. METHODS: We reviewed adult patients who underwent RCP or CCIC (2010-2022), investigating patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and outcomes. We used Cox Proportional Hazards analysis to compare bowel-related complications. Patients with proximal ileostomy were excluded from analysis, as well as those with less than 90 days follow-up. RESULTS: Of 162 patients, 106 (65.4%) underwent RCP and 56 (34.6%) underwent CCIC. The mean age was 55.5 (13.1) and 40.3 (14.6) years in RCP and CCIC group (P<0.001). The leading etiology was radiation injury [34 (32.1%)] and spinal cord injury [32 (57.1%)] for RCP vs. CCIC. In the RCP group, there were 46 (43.4%) patients readmitted within 90 days and 12 (20.7%) in the CCIC group, (P=0.01). Survival, at a median follow-up of 30 (10.3-66.6) months, was 82.1% and 87.5% in the RCP vs. CCIC group (P=0.37). Anastomotic leak occurred in 8 (7.5%) patients in the RCP and 2 (3.6%) patients in the CCIC group (P=0.32). Notably, we found that the type of anastomosis, stapled reinforced lines compared to single-layered (hand sewn or stapled), significantly influenced both bowel complications [hazard ratio (HR): 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.33] and anastomotic leaks (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04-0.75). There were no significant differences in bowel complications (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.15-2.4) or anastomotic leaks (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.06-2.21) between RCP and CCIC groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes ileocolic anastomotic leak rates in a large urologic patient population. Our findings highlight the protective role of double-layered ileocolic anastomosis reinforced with hand-sewn sutures in reducing bowel complications and anastomotic leaks. There were no significant distinctions between RCP and CCIC in survival rates and bowel complications.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。