En bloc transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

整块经尿道切除术与传统经尿道切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). En bloc transurethral resection is a new method for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer that may improve some shortcomings of TURBT. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the perioperative and prognostic outcomes of en bloc transurethral resection and TURBT for NMIBC. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data (WanFang) and VIP Information Network (VIP). We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool and modified Jadad scale to assess the quality of the literature. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software (RevMan) and Stata SE software. RESULTS: We included 16 RCTs comprising 1,505 patients (experimental group: 827; control group: 678). There were no significant differences between en bloc transurethral resection and TURBT in operation time [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.70 to -0.28, P=0.40] and 3-month recurrence rate [relative risk (RR) =0.14, 95% CI: 0.02-1.08, P=0.06]. Compared with TURBT, en bloc transurethral resection significantly decreased 6-month recurrence rate (RR =0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.69, P<0.001), 1-year recurrence rate (RR =0.36, 95% CI: 0.25-0.53, P<0.001), positive number of the biopsy at the tumor base (RR =0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.43, P<0.001), vesical perforation (RR =0.22, 95% CI: 0.11-0.43, P<0.001), obturator nerve reflex (RR =0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83, P=0.01), postoperative complications (RR =0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.41, P=0.002), hemorrhage (SMD =-2.13, 95% CI: -2.89 to -1.37, P<0.001), hospital stay [mean difference (MD) =-2.14, 95% CI: -2.81 to -1.47, P<0.001], bladder irrigation time (SMD =-2.80, 95% CI: -3.36 to -2.24, P<0.001), and catheterization period (SMD =-1.77, 95% CI: -2.63 to -0.91, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TURBT, en bloc transurethral resection appears to be a better treatment option for NMIBC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。