Abstract
Small RNA-sequencing (small RNA-seq) has revealed the presence of small RNA-naturally occurring variants such as microRNA (miRNA) isoforms or isomiRs. Due to their small size and the sequence similarity among miRNA isoforms, their validation by RT-qPCR is challenging. We previously identified two miR-31-5p isomiRs-the canonical and a 3'isomiR variant (3' G addition)-which were differentially expressed between individuals with azoospermia of different origin. Here, we sought to determine the discriminatory capacity between these two closely-related miRNA isoforms of three alternative poly(A) based-RT-qPCR strategies in both synthetic and real biological context. We found that these poly(A) RT-qPCR strategies exhibit a significant cross-reactivity between these miR-31-5p isomiRs which differ by a single nucleotide, compromising the reliable quantification of individual miRNA isoforms. Fortunately, in the biological context, given that the two miRNA variants show changes in the same direction, RT-qPCR results were consistent with the findings of small RNA-seq study. We suggest that miRNA selection for RT-qPCR validation should be performed with care, prioritizing those canonical miRNAs that, in small RNA-seq, show parallel/homogeneous expression behavior with their most prevalent isomiRs, to avoid confounding RT-qPCR-based results. This is suggested as the current best strategy for robust biomarker selection to develop clinically useful tests.