Prognostic Accuracy of SpO(2)-based Respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Predicting In-hospital Mortality

基于SpO(2)的呼吸序贯器官衰竭评估对预测院内死亡率的预后准确性

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study we aimed to investigate the prognostic accuracy for predicting in-hospital mortality using respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores by the conventional method of missing-value imputation with normal partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2))- and oxygen saturation (SpO(2))-based estimation methods. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected infection in the emergency department. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and calibration results of the conventional method (normal value imputation for missing PaO(2)) and six SpO(2)-based methods: using methods A, B, PaO(2) is estimated by dividing SpO(2) by a scale; with methods C and D, PaO(2) was estimated by a mathematical model from a previous study; with methods E, F, respiratory SOFA scores was estimated by SpO(2) thresholds and respiratory support use; with methods A, C, E are SpO(2)-based estimation for all PaO(2) values, while methods B, D, F use such estimation only for missing PaO(2) values. RESULTS: Among the 15,119 patients included in the study, the in-hospital mortality rate was 4.9%. The missing PaO(2)was 56.0%. The calibration plots were similar among all methods. Each method yielded AUROCs that ranged from 0.735-0.772. The AUROC for the conventional method was 0.755 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.736-0.773). The AUROC for method C (0.772; 95% CI 0.754-0.790) was higher than that of the conventional method, which was an SpO(2)-based estimation for all PaO(2) values. The AUROC for total SOFA score from method E (0.815; 95% CI 0.800-0.831) was higher than that from the conventional method (0.806; 95% CI 0.790-0.822), in which respiratory SOFA was calculated by the predefined SpO(2) cut-offs and oxygen support. CONCLUSION: In non-ICU settings, respiratory SOFA scores estimated by SpO(2) might have acceptable prognostic accuracy for predicting in-hospital mortality. Our results suggest that SpO(2)-based respiratory SOFA score calculation might be an alternative for evaluating respiratory organ failure in the ED and clinical research settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。