Do studies in caveolin-knockouts teach us about physiology and pharmacology or instead, the ways mice compensate for 'lost proteins'?

对 Caveolin 敲除小鼠的研究是让我们了解生理学和药理学,还是让我们了解小鼠如何补偿“丢失的蛋白质”?

阅读:1

Abstract

A wide array of phenotypic changes have been reported in mice with knockout of expression of caveolin-1. Neidhold et al. (2007) describe results in this issue that continue this trend by showing that saphenous arteries from adult caveolin-1 knockout mice lack caveolae, lose beta1-adrenoceptor-promoted relaxation, gain beta3-adrenoceptor-promoted relaxation but show no change in vasomotor response to beta2-adrenoceptor activation. Neither the physiological importance for wild-type animals nor the mechanistic basis for these changes is clear. Although the caveolin-1 knockout and wild-type mice express similar levels of the receptor mRNAs, the protein expression of the receptors is not specified and represents, in our view, an important limitation of the study. We also question the physiological relevance of the findings and ask: Do studies in total body/lifespan caveolin-knockout mice further understanding of physiology and pharmacology or do they primarily characterize secondary consequences? We propose that alternative approaches that decrease caveolin expression in a temporally and spatially discrete manner are more likely to facilitate definitive conclusions regarding caveolin-1 and its role in regulation of beta-adrenoceptors and other pharmacological targets.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。