Unravelling technical domain barriers and non-technical skill barriers among interprofessional teams during in-hospital cardiac arrest: a questionnaire-based survey

揭示院内心脏骤停期间跨专业团队面临的技术领域障碍和非技术技能障碍:一项基于问卷调查的研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of focused cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, the in-hospital cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance often remains suboptimal, due to technical domain barriers and non-technical skill (NTS) barriers. We aimed to determine the technical domain and NTS barriers encountered by the in-hospital interprofessional (IP) CPR resuscitation teams through a cross-sectional, quantitative, analytical survey, and to determine whether a poor NTS score alone is associated with non-adherence to high-quality CPR. METHODS: A validated questionnaire was developed comprising 17 items on technical domain barriers and 9 on the NTS barrier domain. A web-based Likert-scale questionnaire was administered to assess perception-based barriers among 400 IP team members across healthcare settings in India, focusing on technical domain barriers and NTS domain barriers. IP members with at least 1 year of work experience, hands-on CPR training, and in-hospital CPR experience were recruited. RESULTS: There were 32.75% doctors, 29.75% nurses, 24% respiratory therapists, 10.25% emergency technicians, and 2.25% ICU technicians. The logistic regression analysis revealed that only five items independently predicted a poor technical domain score: inability to identify cardiac rhythm, non-working defibrillator, unavailability of a supraglottic airway device, unavailability of a correct-size laryngoscope blade, and a delay in loading medications. Five NTS items independently predicted a poor NTS score: lack of clear instructions from the team leader, lack of awareness of the dynamic nature of resuscitation, lack of closed-loop communication, lack of assigned tasks completed by a team member, and lack of knowledge sharing among team members. A poor NTS score is associated with perceived non-adherence to high-quality CPR (Chi-Square test, p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both NTS barriers and technical domain barriers were associated with perceived non-adherence to high-quality CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2025/05/086727 registered on 13/05/2025. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-026-01224-y.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。