Systematic Review of Granulomatous Invasive Fungal Sinusitis Management

肉芽肿性侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎治疗的系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis (GIFS) affects immunocompetent individuals. There is ongoing debate over whether surgery, antifungal medication, or a combined approach is the best treatment. This article summarizes reports about GIFS and its management. METHODS: Eight search engines, gray literature, and review articles were searched. Two independent reviewer groups screened the eligibility of articles. An independent reviewer solved disagreements. Exclusion criteria included non-English language reports, papers with unavailable full-texts, reviews, publications before 1980, and studies lacking information about GIFS management. RESULTS: Of the 279 identified articles, 41 studies were included (n = 89 patients). Sinonasal GIFS with skull-base/intracranial extension was associated with an increase in mortality (p = 0.002, OR = 14.083; 95% CI = 1.753-113.157). Treatment was associated with an 87.2% remission rate (p < 0.001, OR = 7.818; 95% CI = 4.502-13.576); a combined medical and surgical approach had a 74.2% recovery rate. Of surgical interventions, the highest recovery rates were associated with endoscopic debulking (52.5%), extensive surgical debulking (32.5%), and open sinonasal approach (15%, p = 0.132). The utilization of voriconazole was associated with higher recovery rates, but this was not significant (76.9 vs. 56%, p = 0.548). CONCLUSION: Sinonasal GIFS with skull-base/intracranial extension is associated with higher mortality rates. The superiority of the endoscopic debulking and voriconazole protocol in managing these cases warrants further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。