Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial Nerve Dehiscence and Facial Nerve Stimulation for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

成人人工耳蜗植入者耳蜗-面神经裂开和面神经刺激的发生率

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of cochlear-facial nerve dehiscence (CFD) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, measure cochlear-facial nerve partition width (CFPW), and analyze the relationship of CFD and CFPW for the presence or absence of facial nerve stimulation (FNS). METHODS: A retrospective review of 314 ears from 294 adult CI recipients was conducted. Two blinded reviewers measured CFPW and identified cases with CFD from the preoperative or postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan. Analyses included the associations of CFPW and CFD with FNS, defined as facial movement elicited by CI stimulation. Audiologic and surgical data were reviewed for electrode characteristics and management of FNS. RESULTS: Reviewers had excellent inter-rater reliability for CFPW measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.974). CFPWs were significantly smaller in ears with FNS (median: 0.40 mm) compared to those without FNS (median: 0.48 mm; p = 0.003). The prevalence of CFD was 3.2% (n = 10) and 70% of cases with CFD experienced FNS (relative risk [RR] = 14.2, 95% CI: 6.88-25.50, p < 0.001). Cases with CFD demonstrated a higher rate of FNS regardless of electrode type (lateral wall versus precurved). CONCLUSION: CFD is a risk factor of FNS in CI recipients. Preoperative high-resolution CT can identify patients with CFD that are at high risk for FNS; however, use of a precurved electrode array may not reduce the risk for FNS in this population. Investigation is needed of interventions to mitigate FNS risk in patients with CFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。