Conclusions
These findings are suggestive of dual mechanisms whereby ethanol (>0.5 g/kg) overshadows the S(D) effects of nicotine, and at lower doses (<1 g/kg) the salience of ethanol's S(D) effects is potentiated by nicotine. These mechanisms may contribute to the escalation of concurrent drinking and smoking in a binge-like fashion.
Methods
Male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.5 g/kg) alone or ethanol plus nicotine (0.4, 0.8, or 1.2 mg/kg base) in experiment 1 and nicotine (0.8 mg/kg) alone or nicotine plus ethanol (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g/kg) in experiment 2. Stimulus generalizations of the training mixtures to ethanol, nicotine, and the drug combination were assessed.
Results
Ethanol (1.5 g/kg) retained discriminative control despite the inclusion of a progressively larger nicotine dose within the training mixtures in experiment 1. Although the nicotine S(D) was overshadowed by ethanol training doses > 0.5 g/kg in experiment 2, nicotine did potentiate the effects of low-dose ethanol. Conclusions: These findings are suggestive of dual mechanisms whereby ethanol (>0.5 g/kg) overshadows the S(D) effects of nicotine, and at lower doses (<1 g/kg) the salience of ethanol's S(D) effects is potentiated by nicotine. These mechanisms may contribute to the escalation of concurrent drinking and smoking in a binge-like fashion.
