Table 2 Fallacy in Descriptive Epidemiology: Bringing Machine Learning to the Table

表2 描述性流行病学中的谬误:引入机器学习

阅读:1

Abstract

There is a lack of rigorous methodological development for descriptive epidemiology, where the goal is to describe and identify the most important associations with an outcome given a large set of potential predictors. This has often led to the Table 2 fallacy, where one presents the coefficient estimates for all covariates from a single multivariable regression model, which are often uninterpretable in a descriptive analysis. We argue that machine learning (ML) is a potential solution to this problem. We illustrate the power of ML with an example analysis identifying the most important predictors of alcohol abuse among sexual minority youth. The framework we propose for this analysis is as follows: (1) Identify a few ML methods for the analysis, (2) optimize the parameters using the whole data with a nested cross-validation approach, (3) rank the variables using variable importance scores, (4) present partial dependence plots (PDP) to illustrate the association between the important variables and the outcome, (5) and identify the strength of the interaction terms using the PDPs. We discuss the potential strengths and weaknesses of using ML methods for descriptive analysis and future directions for research. R codes to reproduce these analyses are provided, which we invite other researchers to use.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。