Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Posterior Versus Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

后路颈椎融合术与前路颈椎融合术后静脉血栓栓塞风险增加:一项倾向性匹配队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

Study DesignPropensity-matched retrospective cohort study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe TriNetX database was queried for patients >18 years old undergoing single- or multi-level ACDF or PCDF between 2004 and 2024. Patients with prior VTE, thrombophilia, or prior cervical spine surgery were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed using demographics, comorbidities, and anticoagulation use. Primary outcomes included 30- and 90-day incidence of VTE events and post-operative bleeding complications. Differences between PCDF and ACDF were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsThere were 4381 patients included in each single-level cohort and 15 577 patients in each multi-level cohort. Compared to single-level ACDF, single-level PCDF was associated with higher odds of VTE events at 30-days (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.28-2.94; P = 0.001) and 90-days (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.43-2.94; P < 0.001). Multi-level PCDF was also associated with higher odds of VTE events at 30-days (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 3.13-4.76; P < 0.001) and 90-days (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 3.33-4.76; P < 0.001) when compared to multi-level ACDF. There were no significant differences in post-operative bleeding complications (P > 0.05).ConclusionsPCDF was associated with increased VTE complications with no differences in postoperative bleeding events when compared to ACDF. Incorporating surgical approach may enhance VTE risk assessment following cervical spine surgery.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。