Competitive Coronary Flow between the Native Left Anterior Descending Artery and Left Internal Mammary Artery Graft: Is It a Surrogate Angiographic Marker of Over-or-Unnecessary Revascularization Decision in Daily Practice?

左前降支动脉与左乳内动脉移植血管之间的竞争性冠状动脉血流:它是日常实践中过度或不必要的血管重建决策的替代血管造影标志吗?

阅读:1

Abstract

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment are often thought of as relatively recent phenomena in modern medicine, influenced by a contemporary combination of technology, specialization, payment models, marketing, and supply-related demand. Several investigators have reported discrepancies between the angiographic and functional severity of coronary angiographic stenosis. However, the visual anatomic assessment of the coronary lesion severity continues in daily practice. We evaluated the consecutive all coronary angiograms performed between January 2015 and December 2015 and examined only patients who had previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to analyze the cases with regard to presence of the competitive flow (CF) between the native left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. A total of 8,248 diagnostic coronary angiographies were performed between January 2015 and December 2015 at our facility. Of these, 886 coronary angiographies of CABG patients were detected. Whereas LIMA graft occlusion detected in 19 patient (2.1%), the LIMA-LAD CF rate was found in 86 (9.7%) CABG patients. The angiographic severity of the LAD stenosis in CF group evaluated as mild in 20 (25%), moderate in 61 (70%), and severe coronary artery disease in 4 (5%) patients. Our results showed that there is 9.7% rate of LIMA-LAD CF. Therefore, some unnecessary coronary stenting or CABG procedures might have been performed due to limited use of functional testing for clinical decision making. The functional angiography should play a more prominent role in catheterization laboratories as recommended by current revascularization guidelines to prevent overdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, or incorrect treatment decisions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。