Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pertussis serodiagnosis is increasingly being used in the United States despite the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, commercially available assay. To better understand the utility of these assays in diagnosing pertussis, serology assays were evaluated for analytical parameters and clinical accuracy. METHODS: Forty-three antigen-antibody combinations were evaluated for single-point diagnosis of pertussis. Serum panels included sera from laboratory-confirmed cases, an international reference standard, and healthy donors. Phase I panel (n = 20) of sera was used to assess precision, linearity, and accuracy; Phase II panel (n = 226) followed with positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) estimates. Analytical analyses included coefficients of variation (CV) and concordance correlation coefficients (rc). RESULTS: Intra-analyst variability was found to be relatively low among samples per assay, with only 6% (78 of 1240) having CV >20%, primarily with the highly concentrated immunoglobulin (Ig)G anti-pertussis toxin (PT) specimens and IgM assays. The rc measurements to assess linearity ranged between 0.282 and 0.994, 0.332 and 0.999, and -0.056 and 0.482 for IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively. Analytical accuracy for calibrated IgG anti-PT assays was 86%-115%. The PPA and NPA varied greatly for all assays; PPA/NPA ranges for IgA, IgG, and IgM assays, with culture and/or polymerase chain reaction positivity as control, were 29-90/13-100, 26-96/27-100, and 0-73/42-100, respectively. In IgG assays, mixing filamentous hemagglutinin antigen with PT increased PPA but decreased NPA. CONCLUSIONS: Seroassays varied substantially under both analytical and clinical parameters; however, those that were calibrated to a reference standard were highly accurate. Our findings support incorporation of calibrated pertussis seroassays to the pertussis case definition for improved diagnosis and surveillance.