Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare 2 dynamic conformal arc plans based on the high dose rate flattening filter free (FFF) beams, and to evaluate the dosimetric differences. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with early peripheral non-small cell lung cancer were selected, and 2 dynamic conformal arc plans were designed in the Eclipse 10.0 treatment planning system (TPS). One of them was based on tumor-center (T-DCA), and the other was based on iso-center (Iso-DCA). Both plans were created by using the Truebeam linear accelerator, based on 6 MV FFF photons with a dose rate at 1 400 monitor unit (MU)/min. All patients received the prescribed dose of 4 800 cGy in 4 fractions (1 200 cGy/fraction). Target coverage and organ at risk limits were planned and designed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Criteria, and were compared between the T-DCA and the Iso-DCA plans. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the target coverage between the T-DCA and Iso-DCA plans (P>0.05). Conformal index and homogeneity index had no significant differences (both P>0.05), but the percentage of the maximum dose in any direction 2 cm away from the planned target area (D(2 cm)) and the ratio of the volume wrapped by the isodose line of 50% prescription dose to the volume of the planned target area (R(50%)) showed significant differences (both P<0.05). The MU of the Iso-DCA plan was increased by 21% compared with that of the T-DCA plan. Except the maximum dose of spinal cord and esophagus, there was no significant difference in the other dosimetric parameters of the organs at risk between the T-DCA and the Iso-DCA plans (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The dose fall-off of Iso-DCA plan is better than T-DCA plan, but the T-DCA plan is consistently superior in sparing dose to spinal cord and esophagus, and the T-DCA plan has fewer MU.