Development and comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD and N based ELISA tests in various African endemic settings

在非洲各种流行环境中开发和比较评估基于 SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD 和 N 的 ELISA 检测

阅读:11
作者:Chaouki Benabdessalem, Wafa Ben Hamouda, Soumaya Marzouki, Rokhaya Faye, Adji Astou Mbow, Babacar Diouf, Oumar Ndiaye, Ndongo Dia, Ousmane Faye, Amadou A Sall, Cheikh Tidiane Diagne, Houda Amellal, Sayeh Ezzikouri, Diary Juliannie Ny Mioramalala, Fanirisoa Randrianarisaona, Khaled Trabelsi, Mohamed

Abstract

Management of the COVID-19 pandemic relies on molecular diagnostic methods supported by serological tools. Herein, we developed S-RBD- and N- based ELISA assays useful for infection rate surveillance as well as the follow-up of acquired protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. ELISA assays were optimized using COVID-19 Tunisian patients' sera and prepandemic controls. Assays were further validated in 3 African countries with variable endemic settings. The receiver operating curve was used to evaluate the assay performances. The N- and S-RBD-based ELISA assays performances, in Tunisia, were very high (AUC: 0.966 and 0.98, respectively, p < 0.0001). Cross-validation analysis showed similar performances in different settings. Cross-reactivity, with malaria infection, against viral antigens, was noticed. In head-to-head comparisons with different commercial assays, the developed assays showed high agreement. This study demonstrates, the added value of the developed serological assays in low-income countries, particularly in ethnically diverse populations with variable exposure to local endemic infectious diseases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。