Stenting versus medical treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension based on a propensity score matching method

基于倾向评分匹配法的特发性颅内高压支架置入术与药物治疗比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, stenting has been widely used to treat patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and venous sinus stenosis (VSS); however, research comparing stenting and medical treatment (MT) remains scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of stenting and MT in treating patients with IIH and VSS. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, the clinical data of patients diagnosed with IIH and VSS at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to June 2023 were collected for analysis. Based on the treatment approaches, the patients were divided into the following two groups: the stenting group (Group S), and the MT group (Group M). The patients underwent 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the improvement in papilledema Frisén grade, lumbar puncture opening pressure (LPOP), and clinical symptoms after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 128 participants were included in the study. The participants had an average age of 40.0±11.1 years (range, 18-61 years) and a body mass index (BMI) of 27.5±3.3 kg/m(2) (range, 20.0-40.0 kg/m(2)), and 73.43% were female (68 in Group S and 60 in Group M). Compared with the patients in Group M, those in Group S had a longer median time from onset to treatment (2 vs. 1 month, P=0.026), a higher proportion of papilledema (85.3% vs. 68.3%, P=0.033), a higher median pretreatment stenosis rate (80% vs. 70%, P=0.005), and a larger median pretreatment trans-stenotic pressure gradient (15.5 vs. 11.0 mmHg, P=0.001), and a larger median pretreatment LPOP (391.1 vs. 350.5 mmH(2)O, P=0.006). Following 1:1 PSM, both groups comprised 28 patients each, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the covariates (all P>0.05). Compared with the patients in Group M, those in Group S had a lower median papilledema Frisén grade (1 vs. 2, P=0.002) and average LPOP (213.0 vs. 259.8 mmHg, P=0.003) at discharge, and showed more pronounced symptom improvement at the time of discharge (P=0.019), and at 6 months (P=0.011) and 12 months (P<0.001) post-discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The research indicated that stenting was quicker and more effective in alleviating papilledema, LPOP, and corresponding symptoms and signs than MT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。