Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Neuroform Atlas stent is thought to have features allowing for an improved stent delivery system. We aimed to provide a comparison of the Atlas and Neuroform EZ stents in patients treated with stent-assisted coiling. METHODS: Seventy-seven aneurysms treated with the Atlas stent and 77 aneurysms with similar characteristics treated with the EZ stent were retrospectively compared. Outcomes included angiographic occlusion per the Raymond-Roy (RR) scale, recanalization, retreatment and procedural complications. RESULTS: With the Atlas stent, technical success was 100% and immediate RR1 occlusion was 81.8%. Follow-up RR1 was achieved in 83.7%. The recanalization rate was 7% and the retreatment rate was 4.6%. The complication rate was 6.5% (new neurological deficit in 1.3%). With the EZ stent, technical success was 96%, immediate RR1 occlusion was 67.6% and follow-up RR1 was 67.6%. The recanalization rate was 12.7% and the retreatment rate was 14.1%. The complication rate was 10.4% (new neurological deficit in 2.6%). The rate of immediate RR1 occlusion was significantly higher with the Atlas stent (p = 0.03), and the rate of follow-up RR1 was nonsignificantly higher with the Atlas stent (p = 0.08). The retreatment rate was significantly lower with the Atlas stent (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the rates of recanalization (p = 0.5) and complications (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Stent-assisted coiling with the Atlas stent is safe and effective and shows better immediate results as compared to the EZ stent, with improved overall follow-up outcomes.