Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has become an available method for pathogen detection. The clinical application of mNGS requires further evaluation. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 104 patients with suspected infection between May 2019 and May 2021. The risk factors associated with infection were analyzed using univariate logistic analysis. The diagnostic performance of pathogens was compared between mNGS and conventional microbiological tests. About 104 patients were assigned into 3 groups: infected group (n = 69), noninfected group (n = 20), and unknown group (n = 15). With the composite reference standard (combined results of all microbiological tests, radiological testing results, and a summary of the hospital stay of the patient) as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of mNGS was 84.9%, 50.0%, 88.6%, and 42.1%, respectively. Compared with conventional microbiological tests, mNGS could detect more pathogens and had obvious advantages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Aspergillus, and virus detection. Moreover, mNGS had distinct benefits in detecting mixed infections. Bacteria-fungi-virus mixed infections were the most common in patients with severe pneumonia. mNGS had a higher sensitivity than conventional microbiological tests, especially for M. tuberculosis, Aspergillus, viruses, and mixed infections. We suggest that mNGS should be used more frequently in the early diagnosis of pathogens in critically ill patients in the future.