Cost-effectiveness of emergency department-based vs mobile geriatric care models for older patients

针对老年患者的急诊科老年护理模式与移动老年护理模式的成本效益比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults, with complex needs and an elevated risk of complications, account for a high proportion of emergency visits in France. Mobile geriatric teams (MGTs) and the emergency geriatric medicine unit (EGMU) based in the emergency department (ED) have been developed to improve care. Although the EGMU reduces hospitalizations and readmissions, its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS: This study assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the EGMU compared to the MGT unit. In all, 338 older patients were included: 102 managed by the MGT unit in January 2014 and 236 in the EGMU in January 2015, which replaced the MGT unit. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of readmission to the ED within 30 days (30DRA). We conducted the analysis from the payer’s perspective, incorporated a Monte Carlo simulation, and generated a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. RESULT: The average cost per patient was estimated to be €5738.16 in the EGMU, compared to €6701.35 in the MGT unit. The mean 30DRA was 0.09 for the EGMU and 0.13 for the MGT unit. The ICER was €24,079 per readmission avoided (RA). The probability that the EGMU would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €33,622.84 per RA was 63.26%. CONCLUSION: The EGMU appears to be more efficient than the MGT unit, reducing 30DRA and average costs, although further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。