Abstract
In the case of a nuclear power plant accident, repetitive/prolonged radioiodine release may occur. Radioiodine accumulates in the thyroid and by irradiation enhances the risk of cancer. Large doses of non-radioactive iodine may protect the thyroid by inhibiting radioiodine uptake into the gland (iodine blockade). Protection is based on a competition at the active carrier site in the cellular membrane and the Wolff-Chaikoff effect, the latter being, however, only transient (24-48 h). Perchlorate may alternatively provide protection by a carrier competition mechanism only. Perchlorate has, however, a stronger affinity to the carrier than iodide. Based on an established biokinetic-dosimetric model developed to study iodine blockade, and after its extension to describe perchlorate pharmacokinetics and the inhibition of iodine transport through the carrier, we computed the protective efficacies that can be achieved by stable iodine or perchlorate in the case of an acute or prolonged radioiodine exposure. In the case of acute radioiodine exposure, perchlorate is less potent than stable iodine considering its ED(50.) A dose of 100 mg stable iodine has roughly the same protective efficacy as 1000 mg perchlorate. For prolonged exposures, single doses of protective agents, whether stable iodine or perchlorate, offer substantially lower protection than after acute radioiodine exposure, and thus repetitive administrations seem necessary. In case of prolonged exposure, the higher affinity of perchlorate for the carrier in combination with the fading Wolff-Chaikoff effect of iodine confers perchlorate a higher protective efficacy compared to stable iodine. Taking into account the frequency and seriousness of adverse effects, iodine and perchlorate at equieffective dosages seem to be alternatives in case of short-term acute radioiodine exposure, whereas preference should be given to perchlorate in view of its higher protective efficacy in the case of longer lasting radioiodine exposures.