Abstract
Drawing on critical theory and philosophical hermeneutics, this essay examines the processes of industrialization and "cobotization" of scientific practice, understood as the incorporation of generative artificial intelligence into the production and validation of scientific knowledge. The text addresses, first, the narrative objects of science, understood as devices for building consensus within scientific communities; second, the effects of the industrialization of scientific practice, the expansion of the scientific-editorial industrial complex, and the loss of the social meaning of the text; and third, the shift from industrialization to cobotization, both in the interpretive experience of science and in the processes of scientific validation that technify communicative action. These processes, which erode and disarticulate language communities, highlight the need to recover the interpretive experience as an intrinsically human action and to revalue our own environments of scientific validation, in order to restore the relational, situated, and reflective character of communicative action that is intrinsic to the narrative objects of science.