Abstract
Effective research translation and science communication are necessary for successful implementation of environmental health initiatives to improve public health. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) of the Center for Oceans and Human Health and Climate Change Interactions in the southeastern United States conducted a trio of qualitative studies to assess perceptions, experiences, and training needs relative to science communication and research translation of investigators and stakeholders. Interview transcripts were coded using open and axial coding and analyzed for emergent themes. (1) Interviews were conducted with 13 Center investigators. Most preferred in-person and written communication channels and felt comfortable communicating uncertain findings to the public despite no formal training. They asked for training on plain language messaging for communities, assessment of audience needs, and formatting research findings for various groups. (2) Interviews were conducted with 13 CEC stakeholders to learn more about their research translation needs, communication and dissemination tactics, and experiences interacting with scientists. Findings indicated the need for collaborative scientist-stakeholder training to include plain language development, communication evaluation, and audience engagement. (3) Follow-up interviews with 7 stakeholders examined specific topics of understanding, trust, and access and how those can become barriers or facilitators of public engagement with environmental activities. Findings showed the public may have limited understanding of scientific processes, establishing trust takes time, and ensuring access should be incorporated into all programs. Together, these analyses demonstrate the importance of engaging investigators and partners on all aspects of research. This presentation is relevant to other partner-engaged research and provides insights on practices for equitable and effective stakeholder engagement and collaboration. KEY MESSAGES: • Effective research translation and science communication are necessary for successful implementation of water resources management initiatives. • Qualitative research is important for assessing perceptions, experiences, and training needs relative to science communication and research translation for researchers and community partners.