Abstract
Polyesters comprise the greatest proportion of textile fibers and are found in various everyday goods; hence, polyester fibers are a significant source of microplastic pollution and textile waste. The specific chemical composition of commercial polyester fibers is often proprietary and mostly assumed to be poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Polyester is a class of polymers that include poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) (PCT), and poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN), as well as biodegradable polymers. Our study aims to clarify whether household polyester products are primarily PET, are labeled accurately, or contain phthalate additives by applying double-shot pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (Py-GC/MS). We analyzed four scientific-grade polyester reference standards, 52 manufacturer-grade polyester fibers or pellets, and 229 samples from 193 consumer polyester products. From the pyrograms, samples were predominantly identified as PET (87.4%, 95% CI [93.5-81.3%]), but five samples were identified as a different polyester, nine as non-polyester polymers, and 23 as a blend of PET with another polymer. From the thermal desorption chromatograms, diethyl phthalate was the most frequently detected phthalate, found in 23.3% (95% CI [17.3-29.3%]) of the consumer products, including children's toys. Double-shot py-GC/MS advantageously results in these empirical data that (1) counter the assumption that products labeled polyester are always PET, (2) emphasize the importance of creating spectral libraries with well-characterized materials for accurate polymer identification of unknown plastic particles, and (3) demonstrate that phthalates are common additives in household products.