Abstract
Currently, there is no consensus regarding the extent of surgery for stage I pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors, which encompass typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) tumors. Sublobar resection includes segmental resection and wedge resection; the former is regarded as a type of anatomical resection that is better suited for tumor treatment. Therefore, it needs to be further verified whether differences exist in the effects of the two surgical methods on the survival time of patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) time. Survival differences were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. There was no significant difference in survival between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups after PSM in either the TC or AC tumor groups (all p > 0.05). A total of 1680 patients underwent pulmonary wedge resection (TC: n = 1547, AC: n = 133), and 398 patients underwent segmental resection (TC: n = 365, AC: n = 33). After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences in survival, regardless of whether OS or CSS was considered the primary endpoint (OS: p = 0.337; CSS: p = 0.470). Furthermore, segmental resection did not prolong patient survival time compared with wedge resection in different subgroup analyses on the basis of histology, age, and tumor size (all p > 0.05). Finally, the same results were obtained via multivariate Cox analysis (OS: p = 0.153; HR = 1.21; CSS: p = 0.351, HR = 1.32). Sublobar resection could be considered for patients with early-stage typical or atypical pulmonary carcinoid, provided that a rigorous lymph node evaluation is conducted. If the tumor is distant from the pulmonary hilum, either segmentectomy or wedge resection may be performed depending on the specific location of the tumor and the clinical condition of the patient.