Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluorescein (SF) in IV ventricular ependymoma (IVEP) surgical resection. METHODS: In this retrospective study, six patients with IVEP were enrolled. Gender ratio 2:1 male to female, with mean age 38.9 years old. A 5-ALA oral dose of 20 mg/kg and a SF intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg were administered. Telo-velar approach, operative microscope, and intraoperative monitoring were used in all the operations. We retrospectively compared the two fluorescence techniques at four steps during the surgical procedure: step 1: exposure of the tumor; step 2: dissection of the lesion from the cerebellum; step 3: assessment of the tumor borders and differentiation from normal tissue at the base of implants; and step 4: evaluation of possible residual tissue in the surgical cavity. RESULTS: At the first step, the ependymomas resulted well delineated by both fluorescent agents. In this step, 5-ALA was particularly helpful in the case of recurrent ependymoma. At step 2, 5-ALA provided a better identification of the ependymoma boundaries and distinction from cerebellum hemispheres than SF. In steps 3 and 4, SF was really helpful to detect tumor tissue. CONCLUSION: According to our experience, fluorescence-guided surgery of IVEP with 5-ALA and SF is useful to maximize surgical resection with less risk of brainstem injury. Both fluorescence techniques are helpful in different steps of IVEP resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary data.