Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma

酰胺质子转移加权成像和体素内不相干运动成像在直肠腺癌预后因素评估中的应用

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the value of amide proton transfer (APT) weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative pelvic MRI data of 110 patients with surgical pathologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent high-resolution T(2)-weighted imaging (T(2)WI), APT, IVIM, and DWI. Parameters including APT signal intensity (APT SI), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in different histopathologic types, grades, stages, and structure invasion statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, and the corresponding area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: APT SI, D and ADC values of rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) were significantly higher than those of rectal common adenocarcinoma (AC) ([3.192 ± 0.661%] vs. [2.333 ± 0.471%], [1.153 ± 0.238×10(-3) mm(2)/s] vs. [0.792 ± 0.173×10(-3) mm(2)/s], and [1.535 ± 0.203×10(-3) mm(2)/s] vs. [0.986 ± 0.124×10(-3) mm(2)/s], respectively; all P<0.001). In AC group, the APT SI and D values showed significant differences between low- and high-grade tumors ([2.226 ± 0.347%] vs. [2.668 ± 0.638%], and [0.842 ± 0.148×10(-3) mm(2)/s] vs. [0.777 ± 0.178×10(-3) mm(2)/s], respectively, both P<0.05). The D value had significant difference between positive and negative extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) tumors ([0.771 ± 0.175×10(-3) mm(2)/s] vs. [0.858 ± 0.151×10(-3) mm(2)/s], P<0.05). No significant difference of APT SI, D, D*, f or ADC was observed in different T stages, N stages, perineural and lymphovascular invasions (all P>0.05). The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of APT SI, D and ADC values for distinguishing MC from AC were 0.921, 0.893 and 0.995, respectively. The AUCs of APT SI and D values in distinguishing low- from high-grade AC were 0.737 and 0.663, respectively. The AUC of the D value for evaluating EMVI involvement was 0.646. CONCLUSION: APT and IVIM were helpful to assess the prognostic factors related to rectal adenocarcinoma, including histopathological type, tumor grade and the EMVI status.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。