Abstract
As the main component of natural gas and renewable biogas, methane is an abundant, affordable fuel. Thus, there is interest in converting these methane reserves into liquid fuels and commodity chemicals, which would contribute toward mitigating climate change, as well as provide potentially sustainable routes to chemical production. Unfortunately, specific activation of methane for conversion into other molecules is a difficult process due to the unreactive nature of methane C-H bonds. The use of methane activating enzymes, such as methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR), may offer a solution. MCR catalyzes the methane-forming step of methanogenesis in methanogenic archaea (methanogens), as well as the initial methane oxidation step during the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME). In this Account, we highlight our contributions toward understanding MCR catalysis and structure, focusing on features that may tune the catalytic activity. Additionally, we discuss some key considerations for biomanufacturing approaches to MCR-based production of useful compounds. MCR is a complex enzyme consisting of a dimer of heterotrimers with several post-translational modifications, as well as the nickel-hydrocorphin prosthetic group, known as coenzyme F(430). Since MCR is difficult to study in vitro, little information is available regarding which MCRs have ideal catalytic properties. To investigate the role of the MCR active site electronic environment in promoting methane synthesis, we performed electric field calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations with a MCR from Methanosarcina acetivorans and an ANME-1 MCR. Interestingly, the ANME-1 MCR active site better optimizes the electric field with methane formation substrates, indicating that it may have enhanced catalytic efficiency. Our lab has also worked toward understanding the structures and functions of modified F(430) coenzymes, some of which we have discovered in methanogens. We found that methanogens produce modified F(430)s under specific growth conditions, and we hypothesize that these modifications serve to fine-tune the activity of MCR. Due to the complexity of MCR, a methanogen host is likely the best near-term option for biomanufacturing platforms using methane as a C1 feedstock. M. acetivorans has well-established genetic tools and has already been used in pilot methane oxidation studies. To make methane oxidation energetically favorable, extracellular electron acceptors are employed. This electron transfer can be facilitated by carbon-based materials. Interestingly, our analyses of AOM enrichment cultures and pure methanogen cultures revealed the biogenic production of an amorphous carbon material with similar characteristics to activated carbon, thus highlighting the potential use of such materials as conductive elements to enhance extracellular electron transfer. In summary, the possibilities for sustainable MCR-based methane conversions are exciting, but there are still some challenges to tackle toward understanding and utilizing this complex enzyme in efficient methane oxidation biomanufacturing processes. Additionally, further work is necessary to optimize bioengineered MCR-containing host organisms to produce large quantities of desired chemicals.