Torsional resistance of additively, subtractively, and conventionally manufactured occlusal devices

采用加法、减法和传统方法制造的咬合装置的抗扭性能

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the torque load (TL) and angular rotation (AR) of additively, subtractively and conventionally manufactured occlusal devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens (N = 120) were fabricated from four additive manufacturing resins (GR-10 guide, ProArt Print Splint clear, V-Print Splint, V-Print Splint comfort), five subtractively (BioniCut, EldyPlus, ProArt CAD Splint clear, Temp Premium Flexible, Thermeo) and one conventionally manufactured (Pro Base Cold) materials. The TL and AR were tested initially (24 h, 37 °C, H(2)O) as well as after thermal cycling (5,000 thermal cycles, 5/55°C). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé post-hoc, t-test, chi-square and Ciba-Geigy table (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Initially, the mean TL values ranged from 63.7 to 104 Ncm for additively, 39.2 to 265 Ncm for subtractively, and 204 Ncm for conventionally manufactured materials. The initial mean AR values were 41.7 to 143 deg for additively, 38.4 to 138 deg for subtractively, and 29.3 deg for conventionally manufactured materials. After thermal cycling, the mean TL values ranged from 45.7 to 88.1 Ncm for additively, 31.2 to 246 Ncm for subtractively, and 138 Ncm for conventionally manufactured materials. The mean AR values after aging ranged from 19.9 to 124 deg for additively, 48.1 to 131 deg for subtractively, and 19.5 deg for conventionally manufactured materials. CONCLUSIONS: The torsional resistance of additively, subtractively, and conventionally manufactured materials for occlusal devices varies and is affected by aging processes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Material selection for occlusal devices should be guided by the clinical needs of the patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。