Abstract
New computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials have been reported to have suitable mechanical and physical properties for endocrown restorations. However, there is a lack of literature on evaluating the retention of endocrown using these materials. This in vitro study aimed to compare the retention of endocrowns fabricated from 3 different CAD-CAM materials. Sixty human mandibular third molars were divided into 3 groups (n = 20) according to the material used: (e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), (HC, Shofu, Koyoto, Japan), and (Brilliant Crios, Coltene, Altstätten, Switzerland) (n = 20). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 1 week and subjected to 5000 thermal cycles. A universal testing machine (5500R/1123, Instron, Norwood, USA) was used to measure the tensile force. All results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05), and different failure modes were demonstrated. The results revealed that e. max CAD showed the highest mean tensile force value (402.35 ± 15.812) N, and the lowest mean tensile force value was for Brilliant Coris (118.90 ± 12.430) N (P < .001). It is concluded that e.max CAD endocrowns showed the highest tensile force values after thermocycling in comparison to other materials with a significant difference, which may have a promising impact on the survival of endocrown restorations.