Comparative Evaluation of Solubility and Sorption of Equia Forte, GC Gold, and Traditional GIC Restorative Materials

Equia Forte、GC Gold 和传统玻璃离子修复材料的溶解度和吸附性比较评价

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to assess the water solubility and sorption of conventional GIC, Equia forte, and GC gold restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Equia forte, GC gold, and traditional GIC restorative materials were used to create a total of 30 specimen discs, each measuring 5 × 6 mm. After that, they were subjected to thermocycling with solubility and sorption testing. The cylinders (10 of each material) were submerged in artificial saliva at 37°C for 20 days following the initial weight (W1), and the weights W2 and W3 were then weighed, and their solubility and sorption were examined. A statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. RESULT: With a significant P value of less than 0.001, Equia forte demonstrated the highest resistance to water solubility and sorption followed by GC gold and the least with conventional GIC. CONCLUSION: Equia forte can be used as a posterior restorative material because its water sorption and solubility were noticeably higher than those of the other groups.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。