Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rarity and complexity of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) make it a challenge to determine the incidence, survival, and metastasis rates. In addition, the clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis have rarely been reported. METHODS: Data on patients diagnosed with STS in the SEER database from 2000 to 2018 were extracted by SEER*Stat 8.3.9.1, and the incidence trend was calculated by Joinpoint 4.9 software. The KM method was used to calculate the survival curve, and the log-rank method was used to compare differences in the survival curves. The clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis were screened by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 35987 patients, 4299 patients (11.9%) had distant metastasis. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 6.02%, which included patients suffering from both lymph node and distant metastasis. Considering that some lymph node metastases might be accompanying events of distant metastasis, the rate of only lymph node metastasis in STS patients decreased to 3.42% after excluding patients with distant metastasis. Patients with only lymph node metastases (N1/2M0) had a significantly worse prognosis than those without metastases (N0M0) but a better prognosis than those with only distant metastases (N0M1) (p<0.0001). In the multivariate logistic analysis, STS patients with larger tumors located in the head and neck, viscera, retroperitoneum, and certain specific pathological subtypes (compared with the liposarcoma), such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, synovial sarcoma, and angiosarcoma, had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node metastasis is rare in STS, and the metastasis rate is significantly different among the different pathological types. Tumor size, location, and pathological subtype are significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis. The overall survival of patients with lymph node metastasis is better than that of patients with distant metastasis, which suggests a more precise prognosis evaluation should be performed in these AJCC stage IV STS patients.