Applying Radiomics to Predict Outcomes in Patients with High-Grade Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Treated with Preoperative Radiotherapy

应用放射组学预测接受术前放疗的高级别腹膜后肉瘤患者的预后

阅读:1

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumours, primarily treated with surgical resection. However, recurrences are frequent. Combining clinical factors with CT-derived radiomic features could enhance treatment stratification and personalization. This study aims to assess whether radiomic features provide additional prognostic value beyond clinicopathological features in patients with high-risk RPS treated with preoperative radiotherapy. This retrospective study included patients aged 18 or older with non-recurrent and non-metastatic RPS treated with preoperative radiotherapy between 2008 and 2016. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the impact of clinical and radiomic features on time to event outcomes. Predictive accuracy was assessed with c-statistics. Radiomic analysis was performed on the high-risk group (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcoma or grade 2/3 leiomyosarcoma). Seventy-two patients were included, with a median follow-up of 3.7 years, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 67%. Multivariable analysis showed older age (HR: 1.3 per 5-year increase, p = 0.04), grade 3 (HR: 180.3, p = 0.02), and larger tumours (HR: 4.0 per 10 cm increase, p = 0.02) predicted worse OS. In the higher-risk group, the c-statistic for the clinical model was 0.59 (time to distant metastasis (TDM)) and 0.56 (OS). Among 27 radiomic features, kurtosis improved OS prediction (c-statistic 0.69, p = 0.013), and Neighbourhood Gray-Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM) busyness improved it to 0.73 (p = 0.036). Kurtosis also improved TDM prediction (c-statistic 0.72, p = 0.023). Radiomic features may complement clinicopathological factors in predicting overall survival and time to distant metastasis in high-risk retroperitoneal sarcoma. These exploratory findings warrant validation in larger, multi-institutional studies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。