Does the institutionalization influence elderly's quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis

机构养育是否会影响老年人的生活质量?一项系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Institutionalization is a global phenomenon and its impact on elderly's quality of life (QoL) is under discussion. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the influence of the institutionalization on elderly's QoL. METHODS: Searches were performed in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Cochrane Library and SIGLE by two independent reviewers up to May 2019. The eligibility criteria were based on PECO strategy, considering observational studies in elderly (P), which were (E) or not (C) institutionalized to identify differences in their QoL (O). For qualitative synthesis, data were extracted and risk of bias was evaluated through a validated guideline. Meta-analysis was based on Mean Difference (MD) and Standard Mean Difference (SMD) calculation (p ≤ 0.05). The evidence was quality-tested using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: The initial search identified 3841 articles. Duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were read and eligibility criteria were applied, remaining 16 sixteen cross-sectional studies that were included for data extraction and qualitative synthesis. Out of 16 articles, 14 evaluated the Health-Related Quality of Life, using Leipad (n = 2), WHOQOL-BREF and/or OLD (n = 8), SF-36 or RAND-36 (n = 4) questionnaires, and two assessed the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, through GOHAI questionnaire. One eligible article was considered as low risk of bias. In the meta-analysis, 12 studies were included. Leipad questionnaire did not show differences on elderly's QoL (MD 0.11 [- 0.10, 0.32] I(2) = 76%). Differences on elderly's QoL were detected through WHOQOL-BREF (SMD -0.70 [CI95%: - 0.94, - 0.47] I(2) = 93%), WHOQOL-OLD (SMD -1.13 [- 1.47, - 0.80] I(2) = 91%) and SF-36/RAND-36 (MD -5.97 [CI95%: - 11.29, - 0.64] I(2) = 90%). All studies had very low or low certainty of evidence, since the study design influenced evidence classification, and show high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Although the institutionalization influences negatively the elderly's QoL, further well-designed studies are needed to confirm this evidence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。