Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is causally associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric carcinoma. Typically, children get infected during the first decade of life, but diseases associated with H. pylori are seen mainly in adults. Multiple diagnostic methods are available for the detection of H. pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and diagnostic accuracy of three invasive methods [rapid urease test (RUT), histology and bacterial culture] and one non-invasive method (IgG serology) for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in a prospective cohort study conducted on 50 symptomatic children between two and eighteen years of age. Endoscopies with gastric biopsies were performed for RUT, culture and histopathological examination, respectively. IgG antibodies were measured in patient sera using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RUT and positive H. pylori IgG antibodies were concordant in 88% (44/50) of patients. Both tests were negative in 32% (16/50), and both were positive in 56% (28/50). Disagreement occurred in 12% (6/50) of the patients: three of them (6%) had positive RUT and negative H. pylori IgG, and another three (6%) had negative RUT and positive H. pylori IgG. A combination of RUT with non-invasive serology constituted the optimum approach to the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in symptomatic children. The non-invasive serological test (ELISA) could not be used alone as the gold standard because it cannot distinguish between active and recently treated infection; and bacterial culture could not be used alone because of its low sensitivity.