Abstract
It has been suggested that enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits validated in one region may yield variable diagnostic performance results in different regions, possibly due to strain-specific differences in antibody responses in different populations. We tested (13)C-urea breath test-characterized serum samples from 109 U.S. patients and 288 Japanese patients using enzyme immunoassay with different preparations of high-molecular-weight cell-associated (HM-CAP) antigens that are conserved across Helicobacter pylori strains. Replicate antigens were prepared from five H. pylori clinical isolates. Eight antigen preparations were evaluated: two of U.S. origin and six of Japanese origin. The accuracies achieved with the eight antigen preparations ranged from 94.4 to 96.3% with the U.S. samples. With the Japanese samples the accuracies achieved ranged from 92.3 to 97.2%. Use of a pool of HM-CAP antigens prepared from isolates from Japan resulted in a higher median enzyme immunoassay value and slightly fewer samples with indeterminate results compared to the results obtained by use of the U.S. standard HM-CAP antigen for H. pylori-positive patients (accuracies, 97.2 and 92.3%, respectively), suggesting that variations in performance between both antigen source and patient population might be reduced by using antigens pooled from several strains.