Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection can lead to various digestive system diseases, making accurate diagnosis crucial. However, not all available tests are equally non-invasive and sensitive. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic tools for H. pylori infection and assess their correlation with esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) findings. The study utilized the Campylobacter-Like Organism (CLO) test, serum anti-HP IgG blood test, and C-13-urea breath test (UBT) to diagnose H. pylori infection. A total of 100 patients with peptic ulcer symptoms, including 45 males and 55 females, were recruited for the study. Symptomatic patients between the ages of 20-70, eligible for EGD examination, were enrolled. Each diagnostic test and any combination of two positive tests were considered the reference standard and compared against the other diagnostic methods. Additionally, the relationship between these diagnostic tests and EGD findings was evaluated. Among the participants, 74.0% were diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease through EGD. The UBT demonstrated the highest Youden's index, ranging from 58 to 100%, against all the non-invasive tests. The IgG blood test displayed the highest sensitivity at 100%, with a specificity of 60-70%. On the other hand, the CLO test exhibited the highest specificity at 100% and a sensitivity of 50-85%. Furthermore, only the CLO test showed a significant association with esophageal ulcers (p-value = 0.01). The IgG blood test holds promise as a primary screening tool due to its exceptional sensitivity. While the UBT is relatively expensive, its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and specificity make it a potential standalone diagnostic test for H. pylori infection. Moreover, the noteworthy negative correlation between the CLO test and esophageal ulcers provides evidence of the differing effects of H. pylori infection on antral-predominant and corpus-predominant gastritis.