Abstract
Assessing exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) across disadvantaged communities is understudied, and the air monitoring network is inadequate. We leveraged emerging low-cost sensors (PurpleAir) and engaged community residents to develop a community-based monitoring program across disadvantaged communities (high proportions of low-income and minority populations) in Southern California. We recruited 22 households from 8 communities to measure residential outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations from June 2021 to December 2021. We identified the spatial and temporal patterns of PM(2.5) measurements as well as the relationship between the total PM(2.5) measurements and diesel PM emissions. We found that communities with a higher percentage of Hispanic and African American population and higher rates of unemployment, poverty, and housing burden were exposed to higher PM(2.5) concentrations. The average PM(2.5) concentrations in winter (25.8 µg/m(3)) were much higher compared with the summer concentrations (12.4 µg/m(3)). We also identified valuable hour-of-day and day-of-week patterns among disadvantaged communities. Our results suggest that the built environment can be targeted to reduce the exposure disparity. Integrating low-cost sensors into a citizen-science-based air monitoring program has promising applications to resolve monitoring disparity and capture "hotspots" to inform emission control and urban planning policies, thus improving exposure assessment and promoting environmental justice.