Laparoscopic Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion Without a Peel-Away Sheath in Children: A Comparison with Conventional Open Surgery

儿童腹腔镜下脑室腹腔分流术(无需剥离鞘管):与传统开放手术的比较

阅读:3

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hydrocephalus is primarily treated with open ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion, but laparoscopy-assisted VPS insertion has emerged as an alternative. This study compared outcomes and complications of laparoscopic versus open VPS insertion without a peel-away sheath in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 121 VPS insertions (2012-2025) at a tertiary pediatric center in Korea. Patients were categorized into laparoscopic (n = 42) and open (n = 79) groups. The laparoscopic technique utilized only standard reusable instruments, without a peel-away sheath. Demographics, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and unplanned revision rates were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate catheter survival, adjusting for baseline characteristics that differed significantly between the groups. Five-year shunt survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: The laparoscopic group had more revision cases and previous abdominal surgeries; additionally, intra-abdominal adhesions were more common (52.4% vs. 3.8%), and adhesiolysis was more often performed (9.5% vs. 1.3%). However, no differences were found in total operative time, distal catheter insertion time, or perioperative complications. After adjusting for demographic differences between the groups, Cox regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in catheter survival. Both short-term (12 months) and long-term (5 years) shunt survival rates were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic VPS insertion without a peel-away sheath is feasible and safe in pediatric patients, including those with complex surgical histories. It offers favorable recovery and adhesion management outcomes without compromising shunt durability, supporting its use as a practical alternative in resource-limited settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。