Role of Cryptosporidium spp in Development of Colorectal Cancer

隐孢子虫在结直肠癌发展中的作用

阅读:9
作者:Naglaa Fathi Abd El-Latif, Noha Said Kandil, Mohamed Shamseya, Yasmine Nagy Elwany, Heba Said Ibrahim

Aim

investigate the percentage of cryptosporidiosis among colorectal cancer patients. Subjects: 100 patients were recruited from Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University.

Background

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in humans. About 20% of the cancer incidence was attributed to infectious agents highlighting the association between infectious agents and the development of cancers. It has been suspected that Cryptosporidium spp. infection may be correlated with colon adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

Cryptosporidium infection is significantly higher among cancer colon patients reinforcing that it might be considered as a likely risk factor for the development cancer colon.

Methods

Fresh stool specimens were collected, homogenized and examined using direct wet mount and by permanent staining of faecal smears using Modified ZN staining. Molecular detection by PCR amplification of Cryptosporidium COWP gene.

Results

Significantly higher proportion of colorectal cancer patients (32.5%, 42.5%) tested positive by MZN and ELISA respectively compared to only 3.3% and 5% of positive MZN and ELISA among control group. Also, positive PCR was detected among higher proportion of colorectal cancer patients (47.5%) and only 5% of control group. Odds of colorectal cancer is 19 times among positive cases of Cryptosporidium by PCR than those without proven infection by PCR (OR 19.12; 95% CI 4.82-75.99). Comparison of the assessment of Cryptosporidium infection made by two techniques produces a kappa value of 0.770, and .759 respectively between NZN, ELISA and PCR as a gold standard, suggesting a good agreement between the two techniques and PCR. This value of kappa is significantly different from zero, K.770, p<0.001 for MZN and K.759, p<.001 for ELISA. Specificity of MZN (100%) is higher than that of ELISA (96.2%) and both reported higher specificity than sensitivity denoting that both tests are good positive to rule in the presence of infection at 40% prevalence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。