A comparative study of suture versus sutureless circumcision: Evaluating cosmetic outcomes, wound dehiscence and infection rates

缝合式与无缝线包皮环切术的比较研究:评估美容效果、伤口裂开和感染率

阅读:1

Abstract

Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures, where optimal wound closure is crucial for healing and cosmetic outcomes. This comparative study of 50 patients evaluated isoamyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus conventional suturing for circumcision wound closure. The adhesive group showed lower ASEPSIS wound scores and higher cosmetic scores on postoperative days 7 and 30 (p<0.05). Complication rates were also lower with adhesive (12%) than with sutures (20%). Isoamyl-2-cyanoacrylate proved to be an effective and cosmetically superior alternative to traditional suturing in circumcision.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。