Comparative evaluation of tissue adhesives and conventional sutures in periodontal flap surgery: A randomized clinical study

牙周翻瓣手术中组织粘合剂与传统缝合线的比较评价:一项随机临床研究

阅读:3

Abstract

Post-surgical discomfort, delayed soft tissue healing and risk of infection remain significant challenges associated with conventional suturing methods in periodontal flap surgeries. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate four different groups (n=10 each); Group 1 - silk sutures, Group 2 - vicryl sutures, Group 3 - fibrin sealant (Tisseel) and Group 4 - isoepoxy 2-cyanoacrylate adhesives (Amcrylate) and compared effects on wound healing, postoperative discomfort and clinical outcomes in periodontitis patients. Phase I therapy was followed by full-thickness mucoperiosteal flaps elevation, debridement and closure conducted as specified. The measurement of healing was done at 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks by the use of Landry Healing Index, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain, Plaque and Gingival Indices, Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Tissue glues, especially fibrin-based sealants, provided periodontal flap closure with clinically reliable, biocompatible and patient-friendly option which enhances faster hemostatic and early healing.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。