Vascularized fibular graft versus non-vascularized graft after tumor resection

肿瘤切除术后带血管蒂腓骨移植与不带血管蒂腓骨移植的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Segmental bone defects from tumor resection require effective reconstructive strategies. Therefore, it is of interest to compare vascularized fibular grafting (VFG) and non-vascularized fibular grafting (NVFG) in 60 patients. VFG showed better union rates, earlier consolidation and superior graft remodeling. Functional outcomes, measured by MSTS scores, favored VFG. Although complications were similar, non-union and revision procedures were more frequent in the NVFG group. Thus, we show the advantages of VFG for reliable bone defect reconstruction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。