Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), but procedural time and safety vary based on technique. Modified Z-POEM approaches incorporating fewer submucosal tunnels may offer advantages. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared outcomes among 20 patients with ZD undergoing standard Z-POEM (2 tunnels), single-tunnel Z-POEM (ST Z-POEM), or tunnel-free Z-POEM (TF Z-POEM). All procedures included mucosotomy over the septum and deep extension of myotomy into the esophagus (2 cm). Primary endpoints were procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 67.3±12.2 years, and 70% presented with respiratory symptoms. Mean procedure times were 45 min (standard Z-POEM), 33 min (ST Z-POEM), and 30 min (TF Z-POEM), with a statistically significant difference between the standard and TF Z-POEM groups (P=0.014). Technical success was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 1.3±1.3 days. One adverse event (5%) occurred. Clinical success, defined as improvement in dysphagia score (3 to 0.05, P<0.001) and resolution of respiratory symptoms, was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, modified Z-POEM techniques utilizing single-tunnel or tunnel-free approaches, combined with over-the-septum mucosotomy and deep esophageal myotomy (2 cm), demonstrated feasibility, safety and a significantly shorter procedural time compared to standard Z-POEM. These findings suggest potential benefits for ZD treatment, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.