Abstract
BACKGROUND: In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA) is regarded as a key treatment goal. The increasing number of treatments allows for individualized treatment optimization in patients with suboptimal response to first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Therefore, monitoring of clinical and subclinical disease activity on DMTs has been recognized as an important component of long-term patient management. METHODS: EPIDEM was a multicenter non-interventional retrospective study in a large cohort of RRMS patients receiving injectable DMTs for at least 2 years in outpatient centers throughout Germany. It documented measures and ratings of disease activity on DMTs to characterize the factors that made the treating neurologists consider to switch therapy towards potentially more effective or better-tolerated drugs. RESULTS: The cohort included predominantly female patients with a mean age of 45 years and a mean disease duration of 9.6 years, who had been continuously treated with an injectable DMT for a median duration of 54 months. Overall, 34.0% of the patients had experienced ⩾1 relapse on any DMT in the previous 2 years; 21.0% exhibited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increased by at least 0.5 points in 20.1%. Overall, 50.3% of the patients with EDSS progression and 70.6% of the patients with relapses were assessed as clinically stable by the neurologists. A change of treatment was considered in a fraction of patients with disease activity: in 22.8% of those with relapse activity, in 37.8% of those with MRI activity and in 20.1% of those with EDSS progression. CONCLUSION: The results of EPIDEM underline the importance of standardized evaluation and documentation of ongoing disease activity and disability deterioration. Judged from the present data, the current paradigm of low tolerance for disease activity and recommendations for early treatment optimization have not been turned fully into action as yet. More widespread implementation of current guideline recommendations may allow patients to more benefit from the growing panel of effective treatment options.