Assessment and treatment of headache in primary care: a scoping review

初级保健中头痛的评估和治疗:范围界定综述

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good quality primary care is essential for the assessment and treatment of headache but there is evidence that primary care for headache is suboptimal. AIM: To identify the international evidence on the assessment and treatment of headache in adults in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A scoping review of the published literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR) guidelines, and a narrative review of the evidence. METHOD: An electronic search of MEDLINE and Embase (1974-2024) was undertaken. Studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included. Results were grouped by study type and were reported narratively. RESULTS: In total, 1125 articles were screened, 43 articles underwent full-text review, and 28 articles were included in the final review. Six studies used comparative methods, of which n = 3/6 investigated educational interventions. The educational interventions found positive effects on learning, and on outcomes such as diagnosis rates, but the only randomised controlled trial (RCT) did not show any benefits of the intervention. Other comparative studies showed satisfaction with GP with an extended role (GPwER) headache services, benefits from direct access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and benefits from a nurse-led headache service. Twenty-two studies used non-comparative methods, such as surveys and interviews, and investigated approaches to assessment, diagnosis, referral rationale, decision making for prescribing prophylactic medications, educational initiatives, direct access to neuroimaging, GPwER, and nurse-led interventions. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of high quality clinical guidelines on the assessment and management of headache, the evidence shows that its implementation in primary care is problematic and educational interventions are a common focus of published studies. Further research is required to assess the quality of the current evidence and to develop, refine, and deploy interventions that have a signal of efficacy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。