Relapse or no relapse in multiple sclerosis: Can disease activity biomarkers support the clinician?

多发性硬化症的复发与否:疾病活动性生物标志物能否帮助临床医生?

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the assessment of clinical disease activity can be challenging. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic potential of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) to distinguish a relapse from other causes of deterioration. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective study, RRMS patients with new neurological symptoms in the last 14 days were followed for 12 weeks. A diagnosis was established by the treating physician or, when in doubt, a panel of experienced neurologists. Blood samples were taken at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included. At baseline, patients with a clear relapse had a significantly higher median sNfL (14.6 pg/mL) than those with a clear other cause (9.5 pg/mL, p = 0.004). Although not significant after correction for multiple testing, median sGFAP was also higher in relapse patients (73.0 vs 64.6 pg/mL, p = 0.036). An sNfL value below 6.0 pg/mL had a high sensitivity (67% at baseline (CI 22.3-95.7%) and 100% at follow-up (CI 54.1-100%)) to rule out a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of sNfL level can be useful as an add-on investigation to determine whether disease activity is present in patients with RRMS presenting with new symptoms.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。